Weight — fat loss and calories
As effective as the gym, without the gym.
The standout finding here comes from a University of Copenhagen randomised trial, published in the International Journal of Obesity in 2017. Researchers took 130 overweight, inactive adults and split them into groups: one cycled to work (averaging 14 km a day), two did structured gym sessions, and one made no change. After six months, the bike commuters had lost 4.2 kg of fat mass, statistically on par with the high-intensity gym group’s 4.5 kg, and well ahead of the moderate-intensity group’s 2.6 kg.
The point isn’t that cycling beats the gym. It’s that it matches it, while costing you almost no extra time, because the exercise is the commute. You’re not carving out an hour you don’t have; you’re replacing a drive or a train ride.
How many calories you burn depends on the effort. A rough guide, per hour of riding:
| Activity | Calories / hour | Calories / km |
|---|---|---|
| Walking | ~265 | ~53 |
| Cycling — push bike | ~560 | ~28 |
| Cycling — eBike, low assist | ~440 | ~22 |
| Cycling — eBike, high assist | ~260 | ~13 |
The eBike numbers are the ones worth noticing. Even on high assist, an hour’s ride burns around 260 calories, roughly a croissant’s worth, for effort that doesn’t leave you drenched. Drop to low assist and that climbs to around 440, close to a push bike, while still taking the sting out of hills. You choose how hard you work by choosing the assist level.